Bomb Reykjavik! — and Oslo, for that Matter; Goodnite, Sweet Jane. Iceland has joined its fellow savages in Norway in whaling again. The rationalization put forward is that the fin whales that Icelandic savages have killed are no longer endangered. By that rationale, we can kill a minimum of 225,000 Icelanders, because they are not endangered either but can successfully recover, by ordinary heterosexual reproduction, from a devastating mass killing. Let's find out.
+
The world has been entirely too gentle on whaling countries, like Japan, Norway, and now Iceland, that refuse to accept that killing intelligent marine mammals is simply unacceptable behavior among civilized nations. We need to get tuf. Tell Iceland, Norway, Japan, and every other savage nation inclined to kill our intelligent marine relatives, that if they kill whales (and dolphins and such), we will kill them, with the same disregard for their lives that they show for marine mammals' lives. We will blast holes in the sides of their whaling vessels, and then in the sides of any lifeboats they might launch, to guarantee that every last member of their crews dies in the frigid waters they defile.
+
I do not value Icelander, Norwegian, Japanese or any other "human" life more than the life of whales or dolphins. As far as I'm concerned, they are on an absolute par, and if the one sets out to exterminate the other, I am perfectly willing to bring the weight of the U.S. military to redress the balance.
+
Iceland is a worthless piece of rock in the middle of nowhere. It doesn't need any people at all to live on it. Iceland was established by Vikings, those murderous scum who killed uncounted thousands of people in centuries of murderous thievery. The civilized peoples of the Western world weren't able, militarily, to defend against or punish them then. But we sure as hell can warn their descendants that if they continue to act like their barbarian ancestors, we will kill them.
+
Goodnite, Sweet Jane. On a gentler note, I am sad to say that Jane Wyatt, the mother in two classic television series, Father Knows Best and the original Star Trek (Spock's human mother), died yesterday at the age of 96. 96! She was born in my state, New Jersey, and I've always been very proud of her for portraying a supportive wife and mother who never felt it necessary to challenge for supremacy either in the household or in society.
+
American pop culture has lost its mind, and descended into violent, lesbian-feminist madness that holds characters (and people) like Jane Wyatt's mater familias in extreme contempt. Today's airwaves are filled with ultra-violent, supremely powerful women who are ten times the 'men' that men are, able to beat to death any man who dares to bother them. These hyperviolent imaginary women are, superficially, meant to appeal to masochistic men. They are really intended to incite homicidal rage against women. You see, the people who write that crap have, in most cases, been severely victimized by women, and the divorce laws of California, which you'd think were written by women, so anti-male are they, but were actually written by crazy white guys with severe identity problems and unearned guilts. They have given California, and, second-hand, the entire Nation, a poisonous, adversarial relationship between men and women, in which women are monsters and men victims. This jaundiced view has infected society and produced higher levels of anti-female violence than one might expect of a rich and comfortable society. And that is exactly what Hollywood writers and producers want. They HATE women and want men to beat women to death, so create fictional superviolent females to inspire self-protectional violence in men.
+
It is no accident that in this country, violence against women never decreases. In good economic times and bad, whether they be drunk, on drugs, or absolutely sober, angry men continue to beat irritating, uppity women to death. Yet, Hollywood tells women to harass men, dominate men, humiliate and psychologically castrate men. Is it even remotely possible that Hollywood producers don't know that they are inciting literally murderous intergender violence? I don't believe it. I am certain that there are thousands of male Hollywood producers and writers who are so angry about the vicious mistreatment they have suffered from California's insane divorce laws, that they want to incite men who have more guts — or less to lose — than they had, to beat vicious women to death rather than suffer the psychological castration they suffered.
+
Women viewers of 'entertainments' in which women are portrayed as all-powerful, infinitely more powerful than any man or any ten men, think these portrayals are pro-female, when they are actually intended to arouse anger, fear, and defensive violence in men. Women today, from little-girl age, are being raised to think they are not just the equal but actually the enormous physical superior of men, and they can always get their way. Little do they know that they have been set up for a terrible, possibly life-threatening beating by the men they are taught to hold in contempt.
+
The vision of male-female relationships that people, and especially kids, are subjected to on television is "synthetically insane" (to borrow from my friend John Lauritsen, about other matters; give credit where credit is due). To watch television in the United States today is to be assailed by astonishing levels of lethal violence, all in the name of "entertainment". Truly, American television today is entertainment for Nazis. Death-camp guards would love today's offerings on mainline TV. We have lost all decency as a civilization, and not even "conservatives" decry the endless assault of visions of violent, often sadistic, death that our country is subjected to every single day, day after day after month after month after year after year, all in the name of "entertainment". Of what conceivable use are "conservatives" if they do not rail against murder as entertainment?
+
(The current U.S. military death toll in Iraq, according to the website "Iraq Coalition Casualties", is 2,800 — for Israel.)




- posted by L. Craig Schoonmaker @ 6:04 PM