.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
The Expansionist
Sunday, October 03, 2010
 
The Bigger They Are, the Harder They Fall? Jews in positions of power in the U.S. have taken another step toward what is either total takeover of the United States or a disastrous backlash, in firing Rick Sanchez of CNN for saying what everyone knows: that Jews dominate major media. In firing him, they proved his point beyond contention. Still, asskissers in media, including the usually honest Keith Olbermann, have chimed in to condemn not the Jews who fired Sanchez for speaking the truth, but Sanchez, as a supposed bigot — again, for saying what everybody knows beyond doubt to be God's honest truth: that Jews control media and that it is preposterous to speak of Jews as an "oppressed minority".
+
Alas, the Big Lie that Jews do NOT control media continues to bounce around media (Jewish-owned media prominently among them) to deny this obvious fact. Never mind that, when it was published regularly, The Jewish Almanac BRAGGED about how many bigwigs in media were Jewish. No longer.
+
Americans are not to realize that all of the Big Three networks were owned and/or controlled by Jews: William Paley controlled CBS; David Sarnoff, NBC; Leonard Goldenson, ABC.
+
So well known is the fact of Jewish domination of the film industry that Neal Gabler wrote the definitive history of the subject, An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood. Tho Gabler seems to have suggested that Jewish control of Hollywood diminished after WWII, Jews still dominate, directly and indirectly, a fact that is casually acknowledged in, for instance, a blog entry on JewishJournal.com under the title "Yes, Virginia, there is a Jewish media conspiracy".
+
Jewish overreaching is found in more than media. Humungous Jewish overrepresentation in Congress is documented by the Jewish Virtual Library:
The 110th U.S. Senate will have a record number of Jews — 13 — with the election of Benjamin L. Cardin (D-MD) and Bernard Sanders (I-VT), who both served as Representatives in the 109th Congress. All Jewish incumbents running in the 2006 election were elected for another term in the Senate. The 110th House of Representatives will have 30 Jewish representatives, raising the total number of Jews in the 110th Congress to 43.
The 110th Congress ended in January 2009, but Jewish overrepresentation did not. It got worse. According to Wikipedia, there are 13 Jewish Senators (13%) and 31 Jewish Representatives (7%) — for a minority of less than 2%. So Jews have over 6X their proportion in the Senate, and 3½ X in the House. Plainly, if some people are overrepresented, others are underrepresented. Hispanics have one Senator (1%) (he is, as it happens, one of my Senators, Robert Menendez of NJ; the other NJ Senator is a Jew, Frank Lautenberg). In the House, there are 27 Hispanics (6%). The Nation, however, is 16% Hispanic, so Hispanics are severely underrepresented.
In the Executive Branch of the Federal Government, almost everyone at the top in President Obama's economic team, and his Chief of Staff, were Jewish. The resignation yesterday of Rahm Emanuel, the Jewish son of an Israeli national, the resignation of Larry Summers announced less than two weeks ago, and the resignation of Peter Orszag in June may reduce that preponderance of Jewish control in the White House's economic team. But the President's top adviser, David Axelrod, is Jewish. The heavy concentration of Jews in the Obama Administration may have been a defensive measure to neutralize the suspicion, promoted by Far Right Republicans, that Obama is a Moslem. Plainly, that didn't work. Will a change in personnel (and Axelrod may resign before the end of Obama's (first) term to organize his reelection campaign) that diminishes a Jewish omnipresence around the President produce a change in policy relative to, for instance, U.S. blind and slavish support for Radical Zionism? That remains to be seen.
+
In the Judicial Branch, 33% of the Supreme Court is now Jewish, 16½ X their number in society, and 3/5 of a MAJORITY of the Court that arrogates to itself the right to void laws passed by Congress and the President.
+
Jews have also become presidents of major universities that used to bar Jews from both the student body and faculty. Such academic executives have, naturally, the power to establish or at least influence what is taught about Jews, Israel, and U.S. policy in the Middle East.
+
In print media, the Jewish Sulzberger family controls The New York Times and The Boston Globe, and "almost two dozen other regional newspapers in the United States (15 of which publish daily). In 2005, its Broadcast Media Group included 35 web sites, including NYTimes.com, Boston.com and About.com." The Washington Post, Newsweek magazine, and various broadcast stations were controlled for decades by the family of Katharine (née Meyer) Graham, who was Jewish. Whether it is still controlled by Jews is not easy to find out, because these things are not discussed (which is another way of saying that some Jews don't want non-Jewish Americans to know what media are and are not controlled by Jews). Sumner Redstone controls Viacom, which owns various cable TV and entertainment production companies. And on, and on. I believe The Jewish Almanac (1980) had extensive lists of media then owned/controlled by Jews, Jewish editors and producers, etc., but its open pride in such things is not matched by today's Jewish media. Jewish domination of media is hardly top-secret information, despite the reticence of many Jews in media to let Gentiles know how powerful Jews now are in the United States, presumably out of fear of backlash. You need merely read the names in the credits and editorial boards — and know typical Jewish names — to get a sense of how many Jews there are in control of what Americans see, hear, and read.
+
Now and then Jews in media use / misuse their power to get Christians fired — for instance, Helen Thomas and Rick Sanchez, both within four months. Will all Christians and Moslems in media be intimidated by these brazen acts of Jewish bullying? Or will some be infuriated and mount a wide-ranging exposé of the extent of Jewish control of media and other organs of power?
+
It puzzles me that so little Arab oil money has gone to taking over or creating pro-Arab media in the United States. One Arab internationalist does have a substantial interest in a major U.S.-based media empire. National Public Radio reports that, "The second-largest holder of voting stock in [Rupert Murdoch's] News Corp. is Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, a nephew of the Saudi king." The Prince is an unusual man, with a wider worldview and greater tolerance than we generally associate with Saudis. For instance, he used a Jewish law firm I used to work for in New York (as a word-processor) for some of his investment documents, and was cordial with the (Jewish) partner he dealt with.
+
The Prince's substantial investment in News Corp. has not, alas, been used to give Fox News the "fair[ness] and balance[ ]" it claims, falsely, to have. The NPR story quotes him as saying, ""Look, I'm not there to direct the news policy, I'm there to invest in News Corp. — and hopefully they've got some sense to do news properly." News? Maybe. Opinion? Absolutely not. Perhaps the Prince should buy the New York Times Company or some other major media enterprise and use it to fite the anti-Arab, anti-Moslem bias abroad in this land, and get Americans to rethink Middle East policy and how our NATIONAL interests and moral standards require us to end support for Israel.
+
(The current U.S. military death toll in Iraq, according to the website "Iraq Coalition Casualties", is 4,424 — for Israel.)



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

Powered by Blogger