Nobody Believes in 'Man-Made Global Warming'
My statement above may surprise or even shock some people, but think about it. NOT ONE WORD has been uttered in major media, at the United Nations, or anywhere else, about POPULATION in connection with "climate change". Not one word. Quite the contrary, Communist China, the world's most overpopulated country, has relaxed its controls on population to permit a second child for hundreds of millions of families! And India looks forward to passing China as the world's most populous country. As wise Romans first said, "Res ipsa loquitur" — the thing speaks for itself.
+
If people had anything whatsoever to do with climate change, and the consensus among scientists were that human activity is causing catastrophic change to the world's climate, wouldn't there be furious, panicked insistence that the human population of this planet MUST at the very least be prevented from increasing, and, preferably, that the human population of planet Earth be CUT, drastically? But you never hear that, do you?
+
If we cut "greenhouse-gas emissions" by 2% on the base of the world's current population — or to be insanely optimistic, by 10% — but the planet's population increases by 25% or 60% or 195% over the next 50 or 100 years, are we ahead or behind? Plainly we would be very FAR behind if we did nothing to stop people from rutting like rabbits. I should say "heterosexual people", because gay people play no part whatsoever in such irresponsible reproduction, which is not just risking planetary climate — if people really did have that kind of control over climate, which they DON'T — but also risking the lives of BILLIONS of children this planet cannot sustain in human conditions. The Third World is the region of this planet at greatest risk of mass death from irresponsible population growth, yet the Third World is the most hostile to homosexuality, which could prove this planet's SALVATION.
+
Human heterosexuality is the enemy of planet Earth, if you believe in "man-made global warming", or its slitely-camouflaged euphemism "anthropogenic climate change". But NOBODY is demanding that straight people stop reproducing irresponsibly. It is thus plain that NOBODY really believes that people can change or are changing the climate of planet Earth. So let us either stop pretending to believe something we do NOT in fact believe, or fly into a panic over population growth, and do everything in our power to END it. Plainly that would entail STERILIZING large numbers of people (preferably those of lesser gifts), at least temporarily, as by insertion of Norplant/Jadelle long-term contraceptives under the skin of BILLIONS of young women, which would have enormous benefits to society in giving women YEARS in which to pursue an education and/or career, and seek political power that ends the slavery to reproduction that is intrinsic to heterosexual culture worldwide, but esp. in the benited Third World. The United States Government could easily afford to BUY the manufacturers of these long-term, subcutaneous contraceptives and dispense their products without charge to everyone who needs them.
+
In any case, let us trim our rhetoric as to "climate change" to our actual assumptions about population. No one can rationally claim to believe that human activity is responsible for potentially devastating worldwide climate change AND be blasé about a projected immense growth in human population, as to 9.7 billion by the year 2050. The conclusion is inescapable that NOBODY really believes in "man-made global warming".
- posted by L. Craig Schoonmaker @ 8:51 AM

 
Nobody Cares
The Republican Party, and national media, have spent months and MONTHS trying to alarm the people of the United States about TRIVIA, Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server and an attack, thousands of miles from our shores, upon U.S. diplomatic personnel in Benghazi, Libya. Both issues are idiocy that NOBODY CARES ABOUT.
+
Everybody in this country knows that there is NO SUCH THING as a secure Internet connection, but that almost EVERYBODY can be hacked. What few people appreciate, however, is that the State Department's own servers have been CONSTANTLY hacked for MONTHS at a time. CNN reported, on March 10, 2015:

Overlooked in the controversy over Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server, is the fact that suspected Russian hackers have bedeviled State Department's email system for much of the past year and continue to pose problems for technicians trying to eradicate the intrusion.

Federal law enforcement, intelligence and congressional officials briefed on the investigation say the hack of the State email system is the "worst ever" cyberattack intrusion against a federal agency. The attackers who breached State are also believed to be behind hacks on the White House's email system, and against several other federal agencies, the officials say.

Did you notice that?: the State Department's email system has been hacked "for much of the past year"! This has been known for a very long time (note that the CNN story is from March 2015).
+
By contrast, no one has shown that Hillary's private email server was EVER ONCE hacked. Why hasn't this been part of the national discussion of Hillary's use of a private server? Oh, I know: because the media of the United States are hopelessly incompetent, and the Republicans are disgracefully immoral, so have absolutely no scruples. Yet, we let them get away with that! What is WRONG with us?
+
And what is wrong with Hillary's campaign that they have not latched onto this in answer to preposterous attacks from the Trumpists?
+
Benghazi vs. San Bernardino, Orlando, and So Many More Mass Shootings within the United States. Republican scumbags have tried to make a big deal out of the deaths of FOUR Americans in Benghazi, Libya. Never do these slimeballs admit that Benghazi is 5,220 miles from Washington, D.C. (and thus nearly that far away from any part of the United States, given Washington's location near the easternmost shore of the Nation), in a foreign country in which the United States has no legal authority to act and in which we do not have a massive military nor police presence. Their complaint is especially RIDICULOUS given the fact that where we DO have the legal authority to act and massive police and military presence, we have been shown repeatedly to be UNABLE to prevent mass killings. SO massive, indeed, have such killings been as to DWARF the toll in Benghazi.
+
Let us review: Columbine, Colorado, April 20, 1999, 13 people killed (more than three times the Benghazi tally); Aurora, Colorado theater shooting, July 20, 2012, 12 people killed (exactly three times the Benghazi tally); Sandy Hook elementary school, Newtown, Connecticut, December 14, 2012, 20 little children and 6 adults killed (6½ times as many as the Benghazi tally); San Bernardino, California, December 2, 2015, 14 people killed (3½ times the Benghazi tally); Orlando, Florida, June 12, 2016, 49 people killed (12¼ times the Benghazi tally!). Why, on EARTH, with so many mass killings WITHIN the United States that we could do nothing about, do Republicans GLORY in FOUR deaths, a relatively TRIVIAL number, over 5,000 miles from our shores? Oh, I know, because they are subhuman scum who need to be CRUSHED in November.
+
It would take me at very least two hours of Internet research to come up with even a ruf tally of the dead from the multitudinous mass shootings we have suffered in the months since the trivial, dead (in the sense of closed and irrelevant) Benghazi incident. So let us have done with all this Benghazi nonsense, and move on to meaningful discussion of important issues about which we can actually DO something.
- posted by L. Craig Schoonmaker @ 6:43 AM